Natural Cancer Cure with Cesium Therapy
Introduction To Cesium Therapy http://curecancerforever.com/?p=68
Cesium therapy, also called cesium high pH therapy, for treating cancer was discovered in the 1970s. Scientific research that led to this discovery goes back to the 1930s. The key to this protocol is alkalizing the tumor environment with the use of cesium. It may be the simplest natural cancer cure known.
The purpose of this article is to provide a scientist’s views of cesium high pH therapy for treating cancer, as a different perspective for helping you decide whether to use this protocol. However, the information here is not a how-to for using it on your own. There is no single protocol for everyone, since different cancers, cancer stages, and personal treatment histories vary widely from one person to the next. Your best strategy is to decide on whether you are going to use this protocol, then get treatment advice from a medical professional (see below).
History Of Cesium Therapy
The history of cesium therapy as a natural cancer cure is already well known and widely available on the internet. Key researchers have published their explanations and results on why it works and how well it works in clinical settings. As of this writing, a Google search returns 845,000 page hits on cesium therapy and 19,300 page hits on cesium high pH therapy. The vast majority of these pages just repeat each other, so you do not have to read very many of them to get a good historical perspective.
The first proponent of cesium high pH therapy was A. Keith Brewer, who discovered that cancer cells have a high affinity for cesium. Cancer cell membranes readily absorb cesium, which is the most alkaline of the metals. The consequence of taking in cesium, therefore, is to radically raise the pH (alkalinity) of the cancer cell to 8.0 or above, which leads to the death of the cancer cell within hours or days.
Raising the pH of cancer cells is crucial in light of the discovery by Otto Warburg in the 1930s that cancer cells thrive in acidic conditions. Warburg also pointed out the relationships among acidity, the metabolism of glucose, and the reduction of oxygen in cancer cells. All of these factors change in alkaline conditions, to the detriment of cancer cell metabolism.
The earliest and most prolific medical professional to conduct research on cesium therapy was Dr. H.E. Sartori. His first study began in 1981 with 50 terminal cancer patients, 47 of whom had already exhausted all mainstream treatments before undergoing cesium therapy. In other words, their condition was considered to be hopeless.
Dr. Sartori’s basic protocol for most patients consisted of 2 to 3 grams of cesium chloride orally, 3 times per day, plus specific supplements and dietary changes.
The most remarkable immediate result of cesium therapy was that pain disappeared in all patients within 1 to 3 days. Conventional therapy often entails the use of morphine to treat pain in terminal cancer patients. In fact, morphine may be the only drug used on cancer patients after standard treatments have been exhausted, just to keep the patient comfortable until death.
Regarding longer term effects of cesium therapy, half of Sartori’s original 50 patients were still surviving 3 years later. Of those who did not survive, 13 had died within 2 weeks of the beginning of the study. It was just too late for cesium therapy to be of use to this group. Nevertheless, autopsies still revealed a reduction in tumor mass in all 13 patients. One other patient died from a tragic accident after being released from the hospital. An autopsy revealed that her hipbone had been consumed by cancer, leading to a fatal fall at home. At the time of death she had very small amounts of cancer still remaining.
Conventional therapy fails miserably when the initial tumor spreads to other sites. The failure rate is more than 95 percent. Cesium therapy rescued 25 of 50 cancer patients from certain death. Who knows how many would have lived had treatment with cesium begun before modern medicine gave up on them?
The flaws in this study are too numerous to include in this short article. Conventional cancer researchers can easily pick it apart. The study was not designed scientifically. At best, I would call it a series of case studies, not really an experiment. Case studies are the medical equivalent of testimonials with medical data. They have value in spite of not offering statistically significant results.
The bottom line is that Sartori treated 50 hopeless cancer patients and 25 of them lived well beyond what anyone in mainstream medicine expected. Subplots in this story entailed remarkable pain relief as well as individual case histories that defied possibility via conventional treatment.
Sartori’s work was followed by further small clinical studies that all showed similarly amazing results with cesium therapy.
Highest Cancer Cure Rate
That catchy phrase refers to the work of German cancer doctor, Hans Nieper. His success in treating cancer, which included cesium therapy, was so good that he may have had the greatest cure rate of all time. There is no way to substantiate this claim, of course, although it gives you a hint of how good Nieper’s results were viewed.
Nieper was also widely known for treating the rich and famous, mostly Hollywood actors and politicians. The names are irrelevant. However, the most telling comment about his success is a quote by Nieper himself about the FDA, as follows:
“You wouldn’t believe how many FDA officials or relatives or acquaintances of FDA officials come to see me as patients in Hanover. You wouldn’t believe this, or directors of the AMA, or ACA, or the presidents of orthodox cancer institutes. That’s the fact.”
The original source of this quote is either buried in a book or in an interview article, so I have not verified it. It shows up on several thousand web pages, including the quote page for the American Medical Association. This is weak evidence for validating the quote, so we are stuck with it as is.
Stats on Cesium therapy
What is the Cesium Chloride Cure Rate?
FAQ - What is the Cesium Chloride Cure Rate?
Sometimes when a person hears that a cesium chloride clinic has a "cure rate" of 50% they become concerned that cesium chloride is dangerous or not effective. The answer to this concern is somewhat complex so don't skip anything in this article.
Cesium chloride is frequently combined with other treatments, such as DMSO, coral calcium, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ozone, etc. Cesium chloride is clearly the most popular alternative cancer treatment, among alternative cancer treatment experts, for cancer patients who have been sent home to die. And therein lies one of the secrets to understanding statistics.
First of all, understand that virtually 100% of cancer patients who are treated with orthodox treatments (e.g. surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, interferon, etc.) go to orthodox medicine FIRST, meaning their first cancer treatments are orthodox.
However, quite a different picture emerges for alternative medicine. The vast majority of people on alternative cancer treatments had been on orthodox treatments BEFORE they even started their alternative cancer treatment.
This puts alternative medicine at a severe disadvantage. First, the cancer patients who are sent home to die by orthodox medicine, and THEN start an alternative cancer treatment, have been severely damaged by orthodox medicine. It would literally take 50 pages to describe the different kinds of damage (called "side-effects") done by orthodox medicine to cancer patients. See the Dr. Lorraine Day, M.D. tape: "Cancer Doesn't Scare Me Anymore" for more details.
Second, very valuable time has been lost while the patient was on orthodox treatments. Months, and in many cases years, have been lost to the alternative cancer practitioners to treat the patient. The disadvantage that alternative cancer practitioners work under is absolutely incomprehensible.
Most people who use alternative cancer treatments have been sent home to die by orthodox medicine, then they decide to look into alternative cancer treatments, because they "have nothing to lose."
Because of this, and because the experts almost universally use cesium chloride on highly advanced cancer patients, there is a severe bias in the class of patients who use cesium chloride. In other words, cesium chloride is almost exclusively used on advanced cancer patients who have been through the complete range of orthodox treatments of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation, and perhaps others.
Another reason for saying cesium chloride is almost exclusively used on advanced cancer patients is that cesium chloride is a complex treatment because a cancer patient has to monitor their potassium, and perhaps deal with other things, such as inflammation or nausea.
For these reasons, for cancer patients who do not go to orthodox medicine first, but rather go to alternative medicine first, cesium chloride is generally not the first choice of practitioners. There are plenty of effective alternative cancer treatments for patients who have not been through surgery, chemotherapy and radiation which are easy to use and very effective.
When alternative cancer practitioners do not use cesium chloride for their advanced patients who have been through orthodox treatments, their cure rates are generally poor. But statistics can be tricky.
For example, Dr. Donald Kelley had a 93% overall cure rate for treating cancer patients. This is NOT the bogus "5-year cure rate" of orthodox medicine, but a true cure rate.
However, what many people fail to remember is that Kelley did not include in his statistics any advanced cancer patient who died within 18 months of starting his treatment. In other words, if Kelley started working on a cancer patient sent home to die by orthodox medicine, he did not count this patient in his statistics unless he or she lived for at least 18 months after starting the Dr. Kelley treatment.
A similar story can be told about laetrile. For example, Dr. Philip Binzel did not count advanced cancer patients in his statistics unless they lived for at least one year after beginning his laetrile treatment.
Thus, when looking at the statistics for treating advanced cancer patients a person must know exactly what statistical techniques are being used.
For example, Gerson had a 50% cure rate, however, he counted EVERY patient that came to him, even if they died within the first month. Over 90% of Gerson's patients were advanced and terminal. It may be that the Gerson cure rate of 50% was actually more impressive than the 93% cure rate of Kelley, if you understand the way they did their statistics!! The bad thing about the Gerson treatment is that is was administered by an M.D. and it was a very complex and rigid treatment.
Now let us talk about the Dr. Sartori cesium chloride (and I think he also used ozone) study in 1981. Let me quote from Dr. Howenstein's article:
"Dr. H. E. Sartori began his cesium cancer therapy program in April 1981 at Life Sciences Universal Medical Clinics in Rockville, Md. Fifty patients with widespread metastatic tumor deposits were treated. Forty-seven of these 50 patients had already completed maximal modalities of treatment, i.e. surgery, radiation, multiple courses of chemotherapy before cesium was tried. Their condition was hopeless. ... Approximately 50 % of patients with breast, colon, prostate, pancreas and lung cancer survived. Three patients were comatose when the therapy was initiated. Thirteen patients died in the first 2 weeks of therapy. Autopsy results in each of these 13 disclosed reduction in tumor mass size caused by cesium therapy. Also pain disappeared in all patients within 1 to 3 days after initiation of cesium therapy. This may have reflected decreased production of lactic acid by dying cancer cells." http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james14.htm
I did not quote the entire article, but note that 47 of 50 patients were "hopeless" and 3 of the 47 were in a coma before the study was begun. His 50% cure rate for certain types of cancer was astonishing!!
Given that cesium chloride is generally only used for the more advanced cancer patients, and given that some clinics include ALL of their patients in their statistics, a 50% cure rate for cesium chloride is actually amazing!!
Now let us suppose there was some magical cancer cure that removed EVERY cancer cell from the body of a cancer patient within 24 hours, even for the most advanced cancer patients.
What some people don't realize is that even if such a magical treatment existed it would probably only have a 60% to 65% cure rate of advanced, terminal cancer patients. Why? Because many people released by orthodox medicine cannot be saved because they have a vital organ that has been damaged beyond repair, they have so much damage to non-cancerous cells that they cannot be saved (even if all of their cancer cells were removed), they have such a severe case of cachexia (i.e. malnutrition), and so on.
In other words, many of the cancer patients released by orthodox medicine are going to die, even if you could safely remove every cancer cell in their body within 24 hours of being released.
In summary, the 50% cure rate of using cesium chloride on advanced, terminal cancer patients is the best reliable cure rate I have ever heard of for advanced, terminal patients, where all of the patients are included in the study statistics, for ANY alternative or orthodox cancer treatment.
Remember, the cure rate of these patients by orthodox medicine is close to ZERO percent. Remember also that alternative medicine is dealing with a severely damaged patient and alternative medicine has lost months or years of treatment time to orthodox medicine.
On the other hand, those who use cesium chloride FIRST, instead of orthodox medicine first, and do not lose any time to orthodox treatments, have a very high chance of survival, most likely around 95% if they do their homework and keep to their strict cancer diet!!
The original research
Killing Cancer Cells With High pH Therapy
Cesium Chloride and Cesium Carbonate Kills Cancer Cells
<--Cell death-><-----Mitosis--------><---------Cell death------->
Cells, whether cancerous or normal can only live and reproduce (undergo mitosis) in a pH range of between 6.5 and 7.5. A healthy cell has a pH of 7.35 while a cancer cell is more acidic. Cesium when taken orally will raise the pH of cancer cells, but not that of normal cells. When the pH of a cancer cell goes above 7.5 it dies and if it goes above 8.0 it will die in a matter of hours.
What can enter a cancer cell
Every cell in the body is like a little battery. To successfully bring nourishment in, and take poisons out, it has to be fully charged. In a cancerous cell, the charge (called cell voltage) drops from 90 millivolts to less than 40 millivolts. When the cell voltage gets to the very bottom, only 5 substances can pass in or out of the cell. They are water, sugar, potassium, cesium and rubidium. Oxygen cannot enter into a cancer cell. So you see, even if there is a lot of oxygen in the blood, it won't get into the cell. Cesium, because of its electrical properties can still enter the cancerous cell. When it does so, because of it's extreme alkalinity, the cell dies. Luckily, healthy cells are not affected by cesium because their cell voltage allows them to balance themselves. The only side effect is a loss of potassium which can be remedied with eating a few bananas and potatoes. (PLEASE NOTE: Bananas, although they are rich in potassium, do contain a lot of sugar - The only part of a potato that contains sufficient amounts of potassium is the peel, the rest is carbohydrate and will turn to sugar, there are better choices for supplementing your potassium...~Vickie)
It is interesting to note that cancer is virtually unknown among the Hopi Indians of Arizona and the Hunza of Northern Pakistan, so long as they stay in the same environment. This strongly suggests that something they are consuming is protecting them from cancer. The Hopi water is rich in Rubidium and potassium. The Hunza water is rich in Cesium and potassium, making both of the water supplies rich with very caustically (alkaline) active metals.
In his publication, Cesium therapy in cancer patients, Dr. Sartori describes the 2 week treatment of 50 last stage, metastasized, terminal cancer patients (13 comatose), with Cesium salts. All were expected to die within weeks, with the survival rate being less than one in ten million. After 2 weeks, 13 died with autopsies showing no presence of cancer. After 12 months, 12 more had died, but 25, an astounding 50% survived.
*Cesium has no natural radioactive form, and should not be confused with Cesium 137 which is artificially produced.
Cancer cells are very weak, far weaker than healthy cells. It is very easy to kill cancer cells if you can create the right environment. The following protocols are deadly to cancer cells, yet harmless if not outright beneficial to healthy cells.
The High pH Environment
Cancer cells live in an acidic environment, but perish in an alkaline, high pH, environment. Although many diets can help you alkalinize your body, nothing works as fast as Cesium Carbonate or Cesium Chloride.
Cesium for Cancer
Cesium *, a crystalline salt has been used successfully for cancer for many years now. Cesium Chloride and Cesium Carbonate work by raising the cancer cell's Ph to a highly alkaline state. Although many anti-cancer diets also produce an alkaline state, they simply cannot do so as quickly or as fully as Cesium can.
Cesium Therapy in Cancer patients
Certain foods contain biologically active compounds and/or ingredients, i.e., vitamins, inorganic salts, organic compounds, essential fatty acids, minerals, and chelating agents which may either precipitate or prevent cancer development. The relationship between dietary consumption and cancer development is not clear and further investigation continues. Noteworthy is the report on the presence of high levels of cesium [Cs] and rubidium [Rb] in food along with availability of various supportive compounds as vitamins A and C, along with zinc and selenium in diet of populations residing in areas with low incidence of cancer e.g., the Hopi Indian territory in Arizona, the Hunza area in North Pakistan, and the volcanic regions of Brazil. The diet of these populations is similar to the nutritive requirements for the high Ph cancer therapy developed by Brewer's subsequent series of physical experiments with cancer cells. In these tests the presence of Cs+ or Rb+ in the adjacent fluids of the tumor cell is believed to raise the Ph of the cancer cell where mitosis will cease resulting in reduction of life span of the cancer cell. The introduction of such alkaline pH by these alkali salts may also neutralize the acidic and toxic material within the cancer cell. This report combines the use of CsCl with various supportive agents. which have been hypothesized both to enhance the entry of Cs+ into the cancer cell and to stimulate the immune response, in the treatment of various cancers.
Treatment was performed on 50 patients during the last three years at Life Sciences Universal Medical Clinics in Rockville MD and in Washington D.C. All patients were terminal subjects with generalized metastatic disease. Forty-seven of the 50 patients studies had received maximal modalities of treatment, i.e., surgery, radiation, and various chemotherapy, before metabolic Cs-treatment was initiated. Three patients were comatose and 14 of the patients were considered terminal due to previous treatments outcome and cancer complications. The type of cancer of the patients studied and their number is detailed in table 1.
The Cs-treatment was given in conjunction of other supportive compounds under diet control in addition to the utilization of specific compounds to produce adequate circulation and oxygenation. According to individual cases CsCl was given at daily dosages of 6 to 9 grams in 3 equally divided doses, with vitamin A-emulsion (100,000 to 300,000 U), vitamin C (4 to 30 grams), zinc (80 to 100 mg) selenium (600 to 1,200 mcg) and amygdalin (1,500 mg) in addition to other supplementations according to the specific needs of the patient. The diet consisted mainly of whole grains, vegetables, linolenic acid rich oils (linseed, walnut, soy, wheat germ) and other supplemental food. To increase efficiency of the treatment and improve the circulation and oxygenation, the patients received the chelating agent EDTA, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and also a combination of vitamins, K and Mg salts.
Table 1 summarizes the results of the Cs-treatment of 50 cancer patients studied over 3 years. They had generalized metastatic disease, except for 3 patients. Initial death occurrences for the initial 2 week treatment was in the same order and magnitude of these recorded for the 12 month period. The percent of survival of breast, colon, prostate, pancreas, and lung cancer accounted to approximately, 50% recovery which was higher than that noted for liver cancer and the lymphoma patients treated. An overall 50% recovery from cancer by the Cs-therapy was determined in the 50 patients treated. Data from the autopsy made indicated the absence of tumors in patient dying within 14 days of the Cs-treatment. One of the most striking effects of the treatment was the disappearance of pain in all patients within 1 to 3 days after initiation of the Cs-therapy.
These studies were performed under my direction, initiated in April, 1981. Twenty-eight patients were initially treated with CsCl between April, 1981 to October, 1982. They were subjected to various cancer therapies, e.g., surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, and were considered terminal cases with metastatic disease except for 3 patients who were not previously treated. Three patients were comatose at the time of the Cs treatment. Thirteen patients died within less than 2 weeks of treatment. Each patient showed a reduction in tumor mass by the Cs-treatment. Of the breast cancer patients, the most impressive effect was seen in a female patient who was comatose at the beginning of the Cs-treatment and was considered a terminal case. The Cs-therapy, with other ingredients used, was immediately instituted by nasogastric route because there was no cooperation from the patient. The daily CsCl dose given amounted to 30 grams, 10 grams given 3 times daily. The patient was able to leave after 5 days of treatment. However the patient's fall on the floor resulted in complications, i.e., fracture of the neck, and death. The autopsy revealed that the cancer metastasis had essentially eaten away her hip bone causing this tragic accident. The autopsy performed also showed the presence of very little cancer tissue.
The next most frequent cancer treated was of unknown primary. Treatment of 8 cases showed a death rate of 2 within 14 days of treatment and an additional 2 deaths within 12 months while 4 of the patients are still living. In one case, an autopsy was made in a patient after one week of Cs-treatment and showed a complete disappearance of the cancer. There were 7 cases of colon cancer patients who were treated with CsCl. Two of these patients died within 14 days, one of the patients had previous massive chemotherapy, and little time was available to restore her metabolic condition. The previous existing infiltration of the abdominal wall disappeared. However, no consent was given for an autopsy.
In one lymphoma case the patient displayed an unusually large abdomen which was hard and he weighed approximately 250 pounds. The massively enlarged abdomen began to decline in volume, i.e., a loss of approximately 120 pounds of body weight was noted after 3 months of the Cs- therapy. The spleen which was originally maximally enlarged and reaching into the pelvis was reduced to almost normal size. The liver position was down to about the level of the umbilicus and was also reduced to normal size in 3 months. The patient is still living after 3 years after his discharge. Unfortunately, there is no follow-p on this patient and he is being maintained on chemotherapy.
The results presented demonstrate the rate of efficacy of CsCl in cancer therapy. The total 50 cancer cases studied show an impressive 50% survival rate. This confirms the work of Messiha reported in these proceedings showing that the higher the dose it is, the more effective it seems to be. The autopsy obtained from the patient whose death was attributed to traumatic fracture of the neck, indicated that cancer had been initially further advanced resulting in bone destruction. However, the absence of cancer after the massive CsCl dose used in this case is demonstrable of the Cs-therapy. It appears that both dosage, i.e., as much as 30 grams/day and route of drug administration, i.e., nasogastric pathway, might have contributed to the patients rapid recovery. It should be noted, however, that CsCl dose regimens should not exceed 20 to 40 grams due to side effects, mainly nausea, and diarrhea. The authors personal experience with CsCl after an acute dose of 40 grams CsCl indicate that extensive nausea and parethesia around the mouth are the major side effects. This is probably due to K depletion. The usual dose used in the clinic ranges from 2 to 3 grams given by mouth 3 times daily. At a later time, at which time there is no indication of cancer presence, the CsCl dosage will be reduced to a preventative dose between .5 and 1 gram a day.
The lymphoma case presented shows that CsCl efficiently reduced massive enlargements of spleen and liver as well as maximal ascites, causing an abdominal configuration of a tight, hard hemisphere, to almost normalize after 3 months of therapy. This period of time was required to eliminate such a massive volume resulting in the reduction of the body weight noted.
The clinical efficacy of CsCl high pH metabolic therapy is best demonstrated by a recent case of primary liver cancer (not included in the 50 cases reported in this study). The patient was a 39 year old female teacher who was terminal. She was brought on a stretcher on April 25, 1984 with a large liver tumor extending approximately 3 cm below the umbilical level. The treatment was then immediately instituted. This consisted of administration of CsCl, Beta-carotene, Vitamin C, Zn, Se, Mn, Cr, and K salts by the oral route in addition to a concomitant massive IV doses of ascorbate, K, Mg, Zn, Cn, Mn, Cr salts, B complex vitamins, folic acid, DMSO and heparin. After 5 consecutive treatment regimens EDTA was introduced to the therapy and the minerals present in the solution were discontinued. On May 10, 1984, the patient was discharged, returned home walking without assistance and displaying a smile on her face. The liver tumor had shrunk to 5 cm above the umbilicus. The determination of alphafetoprotein (AFP), a specific marker for liver cancer, rare embronal cancer and teratomas, decreased from the unusually high value of 39,000 units, compared to normal levels of 13 units, measured before initiation of Cs-therapy, to 5000 units obtained on the last day of treatment.
The mechanism of action of Cs in cancer has been little studied. Both Cs+ and Rb+ can specifically enter the cancer cells and embryonic cells, but not normal adult cells has been demonstrated by Brewer. The cancer cells contain high amounts of hydrogen ions rendering them acidic and they also contain high Na+ levels than found in normal cells. If Cs+ or Rb+ can enter the cancer cells then the pH increases from as low as 5.5 to over pH 7.0. At a pH of 7.6 the cancer cell division will stop, at a pH of 8.0 to 8.5 the lifespan of it is considerably shortened (only hours). In one case, the author has observed the shrinkage of metastases of breast cancer after one hour of Cs-treatment. Two days later wrinkles of the skin appeared where the tumor was present. In another case of a colon cancer with massive metastasis, of massive infiltration of the abdominal wall, liver and other tissues, seemed to have been reduced within 24 hours and continuing rapidly until the demise of the patient on the 14th day of the Cs-treatment.
The uric acid levels measured at the onset of treatment was approximately 3.5 units which was increased to over 20 units, suggesting massive breakdowns of DNA, which produces the uric acid output. Therefore, destruction of nuclear acids, as reflected by a significant rise in the uric acid, may be used as a predictive measurement for treatment outcome. The failure of uric acid elevation may be indicative of lack of destruction of cancer cells. This has proven to be a very consistent finding in our clinic.
There are certain factors which may enhance the Cs-therapy. The Cs-penetration into the cancer cells can be increased by the following three methods: The first approach resides in broadening the electron donor capacity of the cancer cell membrane by the application of cyanide, an electron donor radical as found in nitriles (amygdalin, Laetrile, mandelonitrite, prunasin, ficin, cassivin), by selenium oxide, an electron donor radical, or by the use of DMSO. The second approach enhances the potential gradient across the cancer cell membrane by the utilization of weak acids like ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) and retinoic acid (Vitamin A). The third method attempts to improve the circulation to the tumor and facilitate the destruction of cross-linkages in the mucoid and fibrinous substances around the cancer cell. This can be achieved by chelation therapy, i.e., the use of EDTA as has been shown by Blumer who reported on the reduction of cancer incidence by 90% by chelating patients (an average of 15 chelations in 8 years). This approach also reduced cardiovascular disease by 50%. Other chelating agents can also be used. Moreover, the use of beta-carotene will lead to decomposition of blocking mucoid proteins mediated by electrical charges; Also, heparin, which acts through electrical charges, will inactivate the immune repelling and immune binding capacities of the blocking mucoid proteins. These approaches will hinder cancer growth and they are virtually atoxic.
It should be noted that certain behavioral characteristics "the cancer personality" of the cancer patient may interfere in any projected treatment modality. This has been reported by Lawrence LeShan in his book entitled "You can fight for your life." His studies suggested that cancer patients seeking treatment, e.g., chemotherapy, radiation or surgery, are probably motivated by a covert desire for death. For example, statements such as, "rather than undergoing any of those treatments, I would rather die in peace," or "I would never undergo any of those treatments or let anyone of my family undergo them because the effectiveness is unproven and the damage that is done with any of those treatments is higher than the effects." are often expressed. Thus, both chemotherapy and lifestyle changes may also contribute to an effective therapy.
The High Oxygen Environment
Nobel Laureate Otto Warburg demonstrated that normal cells would become irreversibly cancerous if the environment they rested in had their oxygen levels lowered by 35% for 48 hours.
Cancer Cells CANNOT Live in a High Oxygen Environment
A healthy individual has a blood oxygen level of between 98 and 100 as measured by a pulse oximeter. Cancer patients routinely show very low oxygen levels in their blood, usually around 60. According to Nobel prize laureate Dr. Otto Warburg, this low oxygen environment is one of the main reasons cancer cells form. Unfortunately, the main traditional therapies for cancer, namely radiation and chemotherapy, also have been shown to drastically lower blood oxygen levels.
The High Enzyme Environment
Cancer cells develop a protein coating 13 times thicker than normal cells. This makes it difficult for the immune system to attack them. By ingesting high doses of pancreatin, you can actually dissolve cancer cells inside the body.
In the natural course of one's lifetime, millions of cancer cells develop, and are harmlessly digested by the immune system. The body uses pancreatin, a secretion from the pancreas to dissolve the cancer cells. As we age, the pancreas is less and less able to make this important substance. By taking pancreatin orally, it is possible to increase the levels of its active ingredients in the blood, thereby helping the body break down the cancer cells and remove them from circulation.
Pancreatin as a digestive enzyme is available from any health food store in the country, however this type of pancreatin is useless for the cancer patient. The active ingredients in pancreatin which have shown to have tumor dissolving abilities are trypsin and chymotrypsin. These ingredients were taken out of virtually all the pancreatin supplements available to consumers years ago. These active ingredients are being bought in massive quantities by the sewerage industries to digest the sewerage into less noxious forms.
This is exactly what is needed in the human body. Our own internal sewerage needs to be dissolved, and to do this, the body uses trypsin and chymotrypsin.
The high pH therapy for cancer tests on mice and humans.
1: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984;21 Suppl 1:1-5.
Mass spectrographic and isotope studies have shown that potassium, rubidium, and especially cesium are most efficiently taken up by cancer cells. This uptake was enhanced by Vitamins A and C as well as salts of zinc and selenium. The quantity of cesium taken up was sufficient to raise the cell to the 8 pH range. Where cell mitosis ceases and the life of the cell is short. Tests on mice fed cesium and rubidium showed marked shrinkage in the tumor masses within 2 weeks. In addition, the mice showed none of the side effects of cancer. Tests have been carried out on over 30 humans. In each case the tumor masses disappeared. Also all pains and effects associated with cancer disappeared within 12 to 36 hr; the more chemotherapy and morphine the patient had taken, the longer the withdrawal period. Studies of the food intake in areas where the incidences of cancer are very low showed that it met the requirements for the high pH therapy.
PMID: 6522424 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]